|
In This Issue
·
NEW ! Pocket VibrA Pro
·
Failure Analysis Part 1 - Contamination
·
Case Study – Results of Condition Monitoring
Low
Cost Portable Vibration Analyser
PocketVibrA Brochure
-
Laser Alignment of all
rotating equipment,
-
Fan / Rotor Balancing,
-
Vibration Analysis
-
Condition Monitoring
(total site contracts)
-
Technical Support and
Solutions
-
Pruftechnik Laser
Alignment Equipment
-
Pocket VibrA Vibration
Analyser
-
Stainless Steel Shims
-
Training
align@alignvib.com.co.za
Tel: 012 661 7844
Fax : 086 670 9045
our
website will be up and running by end of March 2008 !
Quote of the month:
Normal people … believe that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Engineers
believe that if it ain’t broke , it doesn’t have enough features yet.
References
: emerson bearing, IDCON inc, |
AVS - South African
Distributor of a Low Cost Portable Vibration Unit
|
PocketVibrA is a relatively low
cost vibration analysis system |
| that includes
asset management and allows the user to carry out vibration
analysis over any range of frequencies up to 15 kHz (900,000
RPM). The system allows a user to view and record vibration data
from asset measurement points that are then automatically
displayed as trend plots on a PC using the included FreeTrend™
software. FreeTrend also includes a Report Wizard that produces
editable Word and Excel files. |
 |
 |
The system
trends vibration in different frequency bands to show up faults
such as unbalance, misalignment, looseness etc and bearing
quality based on internationally accepted methods The system has
sufficient resolution to allow complex vibrations (such as gear
mesh frequencies for example) to be identified from the spectral
plots. The system fully supports in-house condition based
monitoring and predictive maintenance. |
The
system is so intuitive it really doesn't take long to work out how to
use it although we do offer training on system usage and vibration
analysis.
An
added benefit is that the rugged Pocket PC can also do other jobs such
as thermal imaging (simply by attaching our low cost Infra Red camera)
or by acting as a data entry terminal so that other process parameters
can be trended using FreeTrend.
All
this for under R100 000.00 !!! Please contact Sue Opperman for more
information – 083 456 7886 /
sales@avsrsa.com
Failure
Analysis : Contamination
Contamination is one
of the leading causes of premature bearing failure.
| Symptoms of
contamination are dents or scratches embedded in the bearing
raceways and balls/rollers, resulting in undue bearing vibration
and wear. |
 |
Contaminants may
include airborne dust, dirt or any abrasive substance that gets
into the bearing. |
| Principal sources
are dirty tools, contaminated work areas, dirty hands and
foreign matter in lubricant or cleaning solutions. |
Case Study: Results of Condition Monitoring
One often gets the following two questions:
1. With what condition
monitoring technique are failures usually found?
2. What is the cost saving associated with finding failures?
Condition Monitoring Technique Used:
Data was collected for question 1 above by assigning an inspection
technique to each work request that turned into a work order. The study
was done for 7 months. If a work order for a coupling was turned in, the
condition monitoring technique used was assigned to that work order, for
example: Found by stroboscope. By collecting data for seven months in a
plant, the following was found:
How failures were found
in this particular plant:
Cost Savings from Condition Monitoring
To find the cost saving without using too much effort, the plant did a
quick cost savings estimate for each inspection that saved downtime. For
example, a coupling found in bad condition is estimated to have caused
about 2 hours of downtime, and an unplanned job for maintenance.
The calculation would
look like this:
A: Cost If coupling
broke without warning: Downtime * Cost of Downtime/hr + Direct
maintenance cost (unplanned & Unscheduled) + Potential damages
B: Actual cost of
repair: Downtime (if any - should be fixed in scheduled shutdown) * Cost
of Downtime/hr + direct maintenance cost (planned & scheduled) +
Damages(= 0)
A- B = Cost avoidance
The cost avoidance
calculation was done by operations and maintenance in the daily planning
and scheduling meeting. The result was a cost avoidance of $3,100,000 in
7 months. |